Sign Up To Receive Complimentary Picks and Analysis Via Email Each and Every Day!
First Name:
Last Name:
E-mail:

ARTICLES SEARCH
Advanced Search

MEMBERS LOG IN
User Name:
Password:
 • Premium Picks
 • Subscriptions
 • E-Books
 • Newsletters
 • Free Picks
 • Loyalty Program
 • Money Leaders
 • Hottest Cappers
 • Capper Profiles
 • Articles
 • About Us
 • Recommended Links
 • Contact Us
 • Privacy Policy
 • Scores
 • Odds
 • Matchups









BetOnline.com







Home / Articles / NBA Fullcourt Report (Monday, Apr. 20)

NBA Fullcourt Report (Monday, Apr. 20)

Steve Merril
Steve Merril

Numerous documented national No. 1 finishes in NFL, NCB football, MLB baseball, NBA, and NCB basketball; Won the inaugural $100,000 Insider's Handicapping Invitational.
By: Steve Merril     Date: Apr 20, 2009
Print Article    Send to a friend   

Bulls at Celtics (-8, 196) – 7:05 pm ET (TNT)

Tale of Two Teams

The Bulls pulled the upset in Game 1 as an 8½-point underdog and they covered from start to finish as they never trailed by more than five points the entire day. Chicago became a better team in late February after they acquired John Salmons and Brad Miller from the Kings. Salmons averages more than 36 minutes per game and finished the regular season ranked second in scoring (17.6 ppg), while Brad Miller averages more than 27 minutes per game and is fifth on the team in scoring (11.8 ppg). The Bulls were just 4-7 SU in their first eleven games with the new lineup, but have since gone 13-4 SU in their past seventeen games. The arrival of the new players helped offset the loss of forward Loul Deng (13.8 ppg) who was injured on February 28th and is now out for the rest of the season.

While the Bulls are improving, the Celtics have become weaker without future Hall of Fame forward Kevin Garnett in the lineup. Boston is a respectable 18-8 SU in all games without Garnett this season, compared to 44-13 SU with him in the lineup, but Boston only wins by an average of +3.4 points per game without the future Hall of Fame member, compared to a +9.1 point average margin of victory with Garnett. The difference is on defense as Boston has permitted only 90.8 points per game with KG, compared to 99.8 ppg without him.

Offensive Minded

While Boston’s defense has been weaker without Kevin Garnett, the Celtics’ offense has actually been stronger, averaging 103.2 points per game, compared to just 99.9 points per game with Garnett in the lineup. The Celtics have played a more uptempo style with the smaller lineup, while their interior defense has suffered.

Chicago has also shown better offensive numbers during the past two months since the big trade with the Kings. The Bulls have scored at least 101 points or more in 13 of their past 16 games. Chicago’s problem has come on defense as the Bulls have permitted at least 50% FG shooting or worse in five of their past nine games, while allowing an average of 104.8 points per game.

Chicago’s offense has also improved as rookie point guard Derrick Rose continues to blossom into a superstar. Rose tied a NBA record for a playoff debut with 36 points on Saturday in Game 1 and he also had 11 assists. The key to Game 2 will be if the Celtics can make the appropriate adjustments to contain Rose.

“You know, the guy (Rose) is powerful, so even when Rondo can slide and beat him to the spot, Rose is still powerful enough to blow through him, said Boston head coach Doc Rivers. “And I don’t think we supported Rondo enough. Rondo can’t reach as much, but we have to support more. I thought we did both wrong.”

Rondo agreed and commented, “I probably gambled less (Saturday), but I shouldn’t have gambled at all,” the point guard said. “I don’t need to reach as much. I just have to try to keep the ball in front of me and make him take contested 2’s, the elbow shot. He made a couple (Saturday), but if he makes those, then my hat’s off to him. But as a team I think we just need to make him see five (Celtic) guys on the floor.”

Head-to-Head

Boston dominated the first two meetings this season with easy wins by 96-80 and 126-108 scores, but Chicago has won both meetings with their current lineup which includes a 127-121 home win on March 17th and Saturday’s 108-103 overtime win in Game 1. There was nothing misleading about either victory as Chicago held a 12 and 11 point lead in each win and outshot the Celtics 53% to 49% in March’s game and then 43% to 39% on Saturday.

Game 1 was Under in regulation with just 194 total points and only went Over the posted total of 199 because of overtime. The pace of play was actually faster than the score indicated as both teams shot well below their expected percentages from the field and were a combined 7-for-33 (21%) from three-point range.


 

  Steve Merril

10* SUPER BOWL SIDE - Giants/Patriots (NBC)
Steve Merril CRUSHED THE BOOKS in the NFL Playoffs and he caps things off with a powerful side selection in the Super Bowl - backed by a PERFECT 100% (22-0 ATS) angle that is $$$ in the BANK - Giants/Pats (NBC) - 6:30 pm ET - Guaranteed Side that will CASH IN BIG!


SUPER BOWL Over/Under POWERHOUSE!
Steve Merril has a POWERHOUSE Total locked and loaded for the Super Bowl that he absolutely LOVES. You don’t want to miss out on Steve’s strongest total selection! Grab this EASY WINNER right now! Guaranteed Over/Under that will CRUSH THE LINE!


Click here to view all of Steve Merril's premium picks.

Social Bookmarking
Add to: Digg Add to: Del.icio.us Add to: Reddit Add to: Simpy Add to: Furl Add to: Yahoo Add to: Spurl Add to: Google Add to: Blinklist Add to: Newsvine


Cappers Gallery is a sports handicapping service that features the finest selection of cappers on the internet. Cappers Gallery provides winning football picks, basketball picks, baseball picks, free plays and sports betting articles from a select group of expert cappers like Eric Scheponik and Matty Baiungo that cannot be matched. Website design and development done by www.VMG-interactive.com.





©Copyright 2012 Ten Star Publishing, LLC. All rights reserved. No portion of 10StarPicks.com may be duplicated, redistributed or manipulated in any form.